Why Getting Your Nevada Driving License Revoked is Worse than a Suspension

 

In a typical driving-related case, one of the most common penalties is to have your license suspended for a period of time. When the case is more severe, however, the DMV can have the defendant’s license revoked.

Some people may not understand the gravity of a license revocation. They may think that it’s basically just a suspension under a different name; however, it has worse consequences. Let’s see a few reasons why getting your driving license revoked in Nevada is worse than a suspension.

License Void

The way suspensions work is that you can expect to get it lifted later (although you will have to file paperwork to do so). While the suspension period may increase, you can still keep your own license at the end of it all.

In contrast, a revoked license is permanently rendered null and void. It loses all validity, thereby depriving you of the freedom to operate a motor vehicle in Nevada. You will have to go through the full application process again if you wish to regain a driving license. In addition, there is a cooldown period that you will have to let pass before you can re-apply; its length is affected by the severity of the crime committed.

Additional Provisions

Getting a new license after your old one can be more grueling when the DMV requires that you submit other related documents on top of the usual application forms. For example, they may require you to file an SR-22 insurance form to prove that you are capable of paying off any financial liabilities that may arise from future driving accidents.

On top of that, the DMV may require additional provisions before they grant you a new license. For example, you may be required to install a breath interlock device in your vehicle temporarily or permanently as a condition for keeping your license. Such situations are common in Nevada because many revoked licenses here are due to drunk driving-related incidents.

Refresher Course

As stated earlier, a driver with a revoked license will be required to apply for a new one after the prescribed period is complete. If the driver’s license has been revoked for at least a year before they re-apply, they may need to undergo certain tests before they can proceed. Some of these tests may include:

• Vision tests

• Written examination regarding road rules and safety

• Driving skill tests to determine whether or not you are still fit to drive

Other tests may be added as the situation demands. Note that the applicant may have to pay for some of these tests.

A revoked driving license can be a worse hassle than a simple suspension, both before and after the revocation period has passed. Avoid the extra hassle with the help of a competent driving crimes defense lawyer in Nevada.

Review: Felony DUI Courts in Las Vegas

 

When a person is convicted in a Felony DUI complaint in Nevada, they can expect severe penalties and long prison sentences in their future. Of course, they will do all they can to dispute the charge and avoid all the punishment. It can and will be an uphill battle, however.

Luckily for you, the justice system offers an alternative to prison time and fines in the form of the felony DUI court. Let’s a take closer look at how felony DUI courts work in Las Vegas

Felony DUI Court?

A felony DUI court is a court-supervised alternative program for people facing drunk driving charges in Las Vegas. It is offered to defendants with three or more DUI convictions on their record but no prior related felony convictions. It offers counseling and rehabilitation to help individuals deal with their drunk driving problems, come clean and stay sober, as well as minimize the possibility of repeat offending in the future.

How Does it Work?

Despite its name, a felony DUI court operates like a standard rehabilitation and therapeutic program for recovering alcoholics. It does have the caveat that the defendant must undergo house arrest for a maximum of six months and wear a continuous alcohol monitoring anklet for the duration of the program or until required by the court. The program lasts between three and five years, depending on how severe the charge was.

As a standard, the intensive rehab program usually involves most if not all of the activities listed below:

• Regular urine drug/alcohol testing

• Individual and/or group counseling

• Mental health therapy

• Collaborative case management

• Outpatient services

• Weekly support group meetings

• Community supervision

• Regular court reporting

Additional Things to Remember

You will have to meet eligibility requirements to be admitted to a felony DUI court. These usually include:

• Minimum three DUI charges within the seven-year period

• Identified problems with alcohol/drugs

• Must not have prior felony DUI convictions

• Must not have completed the program before

Your participation is not free or subsidized. You will have to pay for all the fees, including court dues, house arrest, probation, treatment costs and the like. The current going rate is $554.60 a month for the entire program.

Felony DUI court is a viable alternative if you wish to avoid a lengthy prison stay. Consult your DUI lawyer to help weigh out your options. 

What is the 'Shared Fault' Clause?

 

One of the things you learn as part of Nevada’s road rules is that the state has an at-fault clause for road accidents. This means that the person responsible for the collision must pay out for the other parties’ fees out of their own insurance plans. They are legally obligated to do so; they can be prosecuted if they fail to do so.

As a fault state, Nevada requires responsible drivers to pay for any damages they have caused in a road accident. However, there are instances where both parties involved in a collision can be blamed for the incident. This situation is called a shared fault case.

What is Shared Fault?

Shared fault is a legal situation where all parties involved in a vehicular collision played a role in the accident. This means that even the supposed victim in the case is at fault for causing the collision in the first place. It is also referred to as comparative negligence in most jurisdictions.

Shared fault is assigned in terms of percentages. Shares vary from as small as 20 percent of damages to at most 50 percent damages due. The percentage share is assigned after a thorough investigation on all parties concerned.

Shared Fault in Nevada

Nevada has a modified shared fault rule when it comes to car accidents. It allows parties involved in a collision to recover some of the money they have to pay instead of handing out the full amount. That means all parties can receive restitution instead of just having one person responsible for paying for all the repairs.

As a rule, the shared fault clause in Nevada is in effect if all parties involved are responsible for less than 50 percent of the damages and wounds received. Note that the amount of damages each party can recover is inversely proportional to the percentage of damage that they are responsible for. For example, if a person is responsible for 30% of all damages inflicted during the accident, they can get back 70% of all the costs. Going over the 50% limit for damages invalidates any attempts to recover damages in Nevada.

Shared Fault and You

The shared fault clause reduces a person’s financial duties after an accident. Instead of shouldering the cost alone, all people involved in the accident will have to pool in, only paying for their part.

This could work well if you’re facing a criminal charge related to the accident, like a DUI or reckless driving complaint. You have less to worry about when it comes to legal fees, so you can focus most of your resources on the legal hearing instead of worrying about how much more to pay for the other party’s damages and wounds.

The shared fault clause is an important factor to consider when you’re involved in a road accident in Las Vegas. Contact a Las Vegas defense lawyer to learn more about how it can affect your DUI case.

Top Five States with Recorded DUI Cases in Early 2021

More people are back on the road again thanks to improved healthcare initiatives to deal with the pandemic. While this means a slow return to regular traffic increasing to pre-pandemic levels, it also hints at a return to pre-pandemic DUI statistics. Recent reports even indicate that DUI cases in Las Vegas are already spiking up to its old figures in the past few months. What's equally interesting is that the national average for drunk driving cases was actually higher towards the last quarter of the year.

Despite the reports, you'd be surprised to know that Nevada isn't among the top states with a recorded increase in DUI cases in the past few months. Listed below are five states with higher DUI cases recorded in early 2021.

South Dakota

The Mount Rushmore State is reported to have DUI cases with 3.87% of all its registered drivers. According to state and national officials, that is one-and-a-half times higher than the national average for inebriated drivers over the past year. On a more grim note, South Dakotan drunk drivers accounted for 16% more DUI-related fatalities than the national average. Little wonder that the state is among the highest-rated when it comes to DUI for two straight years.

Minnesota

With a 44%-above-average DUI case rating, the North Star State is considered fourth overall for drunk driving bookings for the first quarter of the year. In a surprising contrast, fewer Minnesotans suffer life-threatening injuries or outright death when they get involved in a DUI collision, a marked contrast to South Dakota. The higher penalties for inebriated driving may be a factor for this difference.

Wisconsin

Wisconsin is also another consecutive top placer like South Dakota, and even shares Minnesota's 44%-above-average rating for DUI cases. It has around 3.79% getting booked for drunk driving over the past few months. Even worse for its standing is that it has an even higher DUI-related fatality rate than South Dakota.

Wyoming

Despite having one the lowest population densities across the country, the Cowboy State still trumps the others when it comes to drunk driving cases during the latter half of 2020 and the early parts of 2021. A whopping 4.6% of all its registered drivers has at least one DUI booking, a significant ramp up from the next highest. It sits at 54% above the national average when it comes to drunk driving.

North Dakota

Contrary to its reputation as the Peace Garden State, North Dakota tops the list of states with the highest DUI cases in early 2021. Sitting at 4.9% of all drivers registered in the state, it is 57% higher than the national average for all kinds of DUI. Like most of the top states on this list, North Dakota holds its spot for the second year in a row. In a unique subversion, the state only has an average fatality rating for DUI collisions that is on par with the national average.

The Pandemic may not have had a major effect on the DUI cases in these states, but this should stand to remind you about how determined state governments are in convicting drunk drivers. If you ever end up a similar drunk driving case in Las Vegas, remember that there is a veteran criminal defense attorney that you can rely on to represent you.

Review: What the Prosecution Needs to Get a DUI Conviction in Las Vegas

 In all criminal cases, it is the prosecutor’s job to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime he or she is charged with. It is the prosecution’s job to determine probable cause, properly reconstruct the act, find evidence in support of their theories, and persuade the court that the defendant has done the crime for the reason that they’ve stated using the methods they’ve laid out. This principle is known as the ‘burden of proof’ , and is the primary driving force behind the prosecutor’s job.

DUI cases in Las Vegas are no different. It is the prosecution’s job to prove that you were intoxicated while you were driving, and/or your inebriated driving caused you to commit another criminal act. There are many factors that prosecutors look into to ensure your guilt. For now, let’s review a few of the more common factors that the prosecution needs to get a dui conviction in Las Vegas.

The Driving Factor

DUI charges are motorist-centric crimes; you can’t pin a drunk driving charge on somebody if they’re not at the wheel of the vehicle during the act, after all. This is one of the first aspects that the prosecution will look into and confirm with the arresting officer. They can also look at other witnesses who can attest to whether or not the defendant was driving first and foremost, before they look into whether or not the defendant was drunk at the time.

This may seem straightforward, but it does not apply to all cases. For instance, the defendant may have been involved in an alleged DUI collision, and law enforcement may only be arriving to respond and have not witnessed the act firsthand. There may or may not be other witnesses at the time of the act as well, which leaves only two alternatives: the defendant admits they were driving, or the prosecution finds circumstantial evidence that proves it. For most DUI cases where no first-hand witnesses are available, the prosecution would look for circumstantial evidence like the defendant’s proximity to/location in the vehicle, the presence of car keys, the state of the engine at the time of the arrest, the defendant’s state of wakefulness, and so on.

The Roadway Factor

One of the deciding factors that commences a DUI trial is the location of the act; it is the prosecution’s job to prove that the drunk driving incident happened on a public road. It is listed in the Nevada Revised Statutes as a prerequisite for a DUI charge. You might notice that most drunk driving incidents that go to trial happened on highways, interstate roads, and city routes.

However, you must be wary about using this aspect to defend yourself against a drunk driving conviction. Note that the actual wording for this statute is ‘a road on which the public has access’. This means that, as long as most people can use the roadway freely, it counts as a ‘road with public access’. This means that even private parkways in exclusive residential areas can still be considered as public roads, and there is a chance that getting arrested there will open you up to a DUI conviction. 

The Intoxication Factor

Above all else, the prosecution must prove that the defendant was inebriated during the alleged instance of the act to get their conviction. This often involves citing data from blood and breathalyzer tests taken during or after the arrest. Remember that the defendant’s blood alcohol content should only breach the 0.08 limit to increase the chances of, if not outright lead to, a criminal conviction.

What if the tests were taken after the alleged act of drunk driving? In such situations, the prosecution would conduct a retrograde extrapolation: tracking back using inferences from the delated BAC test and circumstantial evidence to assess how much alcohol the defendant still had in his or her body during the instance of the crime. In many other instances, expert witnesses are also called in to elaborate on the findings and prove that they are accurate even if they were not taken immediately.

DUI charges in Las Vegas are complex, and can involve many other factors that can land you in prison for a long time. However, if you understand these aspects and know how to defend agaisnt them, you are sure to get a not guilty verdict, or an outright dismissal. Never forget to consult with a veteran criminal defense attorney in Las Vegas before tackling a DUI complaint.

On Public Defenders for DUI in Las Vegas

 When a person is being arrested in Las Vegas, the arresting officer is required to explain the defendant’s Miranda Rights during the process so they can understand what rights they have while in custody. Among these rights is the access to be appointed with an attorney if they wish to, or are unable to afford their own legal representation. They are often referred to as public defenders, and they are provided for by state or federal courts to handle defense duties for the individual.

On paper, a public defender is a decent alternative to private firms because the defendant does not need to spend much to avail of their services. However, not many are satisfied with their representation, especially for specific crimes like homicide, drug crimes, and domestic violence. Let’s look a little more on why there’s little trust for public defenders for crimes like DUI in Las Vegas.

Understanding the Public Defender

Simply put, a public defender is an attorney fully employed by state or Federal governments to provide legal representation for defendants who cannot afford a private lawyer and do not wish to speak about their case without representation. They often have fixed salaries depending on several factors, like how public defenders are classified in their jurisdiction, how long they’ve been in the service, and so on. Public defenders can often be hired three to four years out of law school; some veteran defense attorneys spent their formative years in the public defender work prior to establishing their own practices or firms.

One thing that people must realize is that gaining a public defender is not automatic like what is often depicted in fiction. One has to formally request the court to provide them with a public defender first; afterwards, the authorities will have to determine if the defendant is truly indigent before the request can be considered and approved. Note that in the case of Clark County, public defenders are paid a fixed fee, as instructed by the court and depending on the results of the case.

Why The Distrust?

Public defenders are generally reliable in their work, and many can boast years of experience handling a wide variety of crimes. However, many people who have had to go through legal proceedings with a public attorney have less-than-flattering things to say about their experience. Complaints about limited communication outside of hearings, rushing to close a plea deal, and frequent mistakes during the trial are fairly common. Some extreme cases even accuse their assigned attorney of colluding with the court to get the worst plea deal for their case.

What many people do not realize is that there is a logical reason behind the rather haphazard way public defenders handle cases: they are overworked and underpaid. Clark County’s public attorney’s office may have a sizable staff but they are still inundated with hundreds of requests for representation daily. A single lawyer may be required to face a hundred clients a day, leaving them little time to fully discuss each of their cases. Going straight for the plea deal is often their way of reducing their workload so they can focus on major charges that need serious help.

The Public DUI Defender and You

DUI crimes in Las Vegas abound almost a dime a dozen. With how many DUI charges go to trial every day, it is only natural that there will be a number of defendants who cannot afford the full services of a private practice and will have to rely on a public defender to see their case through. Considering their reputation as stated in the previous section, some of these defendants may be hesitant to sign up for a public defender.

Public defenders are not bad if they are standing on their own merits; after all, many of these attorneys have handled complicated cases in the past and may have even won convincing dismissals. However, with the kind of burdens they have to juggle on a regular basis, especially for specialized charges like DUI, you might be asking yourself if it is really worth it to work with an attorney that may be handling 50 other clients besides you on the same day. If you are facing a Las Vegas DUI charge and are considering a public defender, you must ask yourself a few questions before proceeding:

1. Is my DUI charge severe enough that I need full-time representation?

2. Do I understand the implications of my charge, or does my potential lawyer still need to explain things to me?

3. Can I avoid spending more of my limited money if I go with a public defender?

4. Is a plea deal an acceptable alternative to a DUI conviction for my case?

If you answer ‘no’ to at least one of these questions, you might need to consider going with a private DUI attorney instead, even if it might cost you beyond your current financial capability.

Public defenders are admirable because of their selflessness, devotion to duty, and experience; they just get a bad reputation because of the demands of their position as public officials. They can be relied upon to handle your Las Vegas DUI case as much as any other attorney if you put your trust in them. In the end, it is still up to you to determine which DUI defense lawyer you will work with.

Why Your Nevada DUI Record Sealing Request was Denied

For a person dealing with a Nevada DUI record (especially those affected by a third DUI conviction), record-sealing is a surefire way to help get their life back on track. Unless their criminal record is sealed, they will have a difficult time getting a job, applying for school or a bank account, or most importantly, reinstating their driving license. Record Sealing allows these individuals to remove the record from their personal file, enabling them to return to their normal life (although higher law enforcement still has access to it for future cases).

Unfortunately, there are many ways why your Nevada DUI record sealing request can be denied. A number of the most common reasons are listed below.

• The statutory length of time was not satisfied (NRS 245)
• There are other pending cases that have not been resolved
• For a former member of the armed forces, you have a Dishonorable Discharge on your record
• You were convicted of severe crimes like child abuse or sexual assault, and/or you are a registered sex offender
• Your petition was incomplete (either brought about by missing documents or other past cases were not included in the petition)

Keeping an eye out on possible hurdles to your record sealing petition is a must if you do not want to waste all your effort for nothing. Consult with a Las Vegas attorney to get a better idea of how to conduct a record sealing petition properly.